It's Time America Begins Looking at Three-Dimensional Foreign Trade Barriers Without Rose-Colored Glasses

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/3e6a2afa-ac0b-11dd-aa46-000077b07658.html?nclick_check=1

America needs a bipartisan coalition on trade


Leo Hindery and Shanker Singham

Financial Times

November 6, 2008


In the past 15 years we have seen the almost complete unravelling of the bipartisan coalition on trade policy that once productively defined the modern free trade movement in the US. For many in each political party, this unravelling is welcome – progressives believe there has been too much wage stagnation and offshoring of jobs; conservatives that US companies have faced too much opposition to their international growth. Yet without another bipartisan coalition, the prospects for negotiating further trade barrier reductions around the world will be dim.


While the two of us approach trade from different political persuasions, we agree that America’s trade deals need to follow three principles. They must provide clear and measurable benefits for American workers; they must be explicitly designed also to lift up workers around the world, which is the right thing to do morally and economically; and they must be realistic about country differences in terms of the rule of law and state of development – that is, one size does not fit all when it comes to trade policy.


We also agree that there are at least four planks on which the administration of Barack Obama, Congress, labour and business should have consensus.


First, that trade liberalisation, if fairly carried out, continues to hold enormous promise for the world’s poor and for companies and workers, including American workers.


Second, that trade liberalisation is not fairly carried out if countries are allowed to distort markets through public sector restraints on trade, illegal subsidies or the anti-competitive operation of state-supported enterprises.


Third, that businesses must have maximum protection for their physical and intellectual property.


Fourth, that the US needs to invest substantial resources in clean energy, education and infrastructure to ensure that we keep our competitive edge and that our workers have the skills they need to fill the jobs of the future.


In the world today, there are two sets of business and trade rules. One set resides in the developed countries, such as the US and Europe, where companies compete largely on the basis of business acumen. The other set resides in the world’s largest emerging markets, where national champions are chosen to be global competitors and the full power of the state is deployed to assist and sometimes own them. US workers are suffering because our open competition approach is being swamped by some of our competitors’ more mercantilist, often unfair and sometimes even illegal practices.


Emerging market countries, especially Brazil, Russia, India and China (the Brics), and some Asian countries, have economic policies to retain and improve the quality of their existing jobs and induce foreign corporations to shift production facilities and technology to them. Faced with these practices, foreign companies cannot be successful on their merits, even when they are given so-called “market access”.


It is imperative – way past time, in fact – for America to be as aggressive in defending its economic interests as our trading partners are in advancing theirs. Specifically, the US trade representative should supplement the annual survey of foreign country trade barriers to include market distortions of any sort. Also, the World Trade Organisation must confront market distortions as aggressively as it addresses tariffs and other border measures and it must enforce vigorously our trade agreements, including demanding “parity of enforcement” among all parties.


Domestically, we must encourage new jobs through enlightened corporate tax policies and stop encouraging the offshoring of millions of US jobs through misguided ones. Also, by eliminating the tax deferral incentives for corporations to relocate production overseas, we can mitigate government complicity in aiding offshoring.


Finally, we should cut taxes for all US manufacturers and give tax credits to US companies that invest in the skills of American workers, in research and development for jobs here at home, and in new machinery, equipment and software.


Leo Hindery Jr is a Democratic party trade and economic policy adviser and chairs the Smart Globalisation Initiative at the New America Foundation. He is managing partner of a media industry private equity fund. Shanker Singham was a senior trade adviser to Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney. He is chair of the International Round Table on Trade and Competition Policy, and leads the Market Access/WTO group of Squire, Sanders & Dempsey

APEC Members Pledge Effort to Avoid Trade Protectionism: Are President-elect Obama and the US Congress Listening??

http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/apec-leaders-vow-to-stick-with-free-markets/2008/11/23/1227375062156.html


APEC leaders vow to stick with free markets




Mark Davis Political Correspondent in Lima



The Sydney Morning Herald



November 24, 2008

ASIA-PACIFIC political leaders have promised not to resort to protectionism as the world's economies slow sharply in coming months after hearing a strong plea from the outgoing US President, George Bush, to maintain their commitment to free markets despite the global financial turmoil.

In a statement last night, the leaders of the 21 member economies of the Asia-Pacific Economic Co-operation forum also agreed to the recovery plan endorsed a week earlier by the G20 grouping, which calls on governments to stimulate their economies to insulate them from the global slowdown.

The Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, joined his counterparts from the US and China in pressing hard for the annual APEC summit to make a commitment in favour of free trade because of concerns that a revival of protectionism could turn the global financial meltdown into a deep recession as occurred in the 1930s.

Australian officials attending the summit in Lima, Peru, said the APEC statement was significant because it extended the commitment to the G20's Washington Declaration to the 11 APEC countries that are not also members of the G20 group.

They said the language of the APEC leaders' statement was even stronger than the Washington Declaration because it gave a "commitment" to achieve a break-through by the end of the year in the Doha round of multilateral trade talks, which aim to free up trade in agricultural products, manufactured goods and services.

The statement acknowledged that in many countries, slowing economic growth would lead to political pressure to erect trade barriers to protect local companies but said protectionist measures would only worsen the economic situation. "We strongly support the Washington Declaration and will refrain within the next 12 months from raising new barriers to investment or trade in goods and services [and from] imposing new export restrictions," it said.

Australian officials believe the pro-free trade statement will send a message to the US president-elect Barack Obama, who will ultimately, with the European Union and the developing countries of Brazil, India and China, be the big players in securing a new free trade deal in the Doha talks.

[See, e.g.: Congressman Rangel and Other House Ways & Means Committee Majority Members Provide Political Cover for Clinton & Obama to Promote Trade Protectionism, ITSSD Journal on Disguised Trade Barriers, at: http://itssddisguisedtradebarriers.blogspot.com/2008/04/house-ways-means-committee-chairs-play.html ];

[See, e.g.: Trade Expert Criticizes Obama & Blue Party's Prescription for Economic Change: Adoption of the European Trade Strategy Known as 'Export-Protectionism', ITSSD Journal on Disguised Trade Barriers, at: http://itssddisguisedtradebarriers.blogspot.com/2008/09/trade-expert-criticizes-obama-blue.html ];

[See, e.g.: Africa Suffers From European Protectionism Yet Again: Is This What EURObama's Embedded Carbon/ Carbon Tariff-Focused US Trade Policies Would Achieve?, ITSSD Journal on Disguised Trade Barriers, at: http://itssddisguisedtradebarriers.blogspot.com/2008/09/africa-suffers-from-european.html ];

[See, e.g.: Princeton University Global Governance Advocate Calls for New Wave of American Regulatory Socialism in the Image of European Protectionism, ITSSD Journal on Disguisted Trade Barriers, at: http://itssddisguisedtradebarriers.blogspot.com/2008/06/princeton-university-global-governance.html ];

[See, e.g.: OBAMA-BROWN-MICHAUD Non-Tariff Trade Barrier Act Likely to Devastate US Economy, Trigger a Global Trade War & Endanger World Peace, ITSSD Journal on Disguised Trade Barriers, at: http://itssddisguisedtradebarriers.blogspot.com/2008/06/us-trading-partners-beware-obama.html ].

The APEC summit is likely to be Mr Bush's last international gathering before he hands over to Mr Obama in January. He urged the gathering not to lose faith in free markets and called for an Asia-Pacific region of "free markets, free trade and free people".

"It is also essential that governments resist the temptation to overcorrect by imposing regulations that would stifle innovation and strangle growth," he said. "One of the enduring lessons of the Great Depression is that global protectionism is a path to global economic ruin."

The financial crisis is widely regarded as the most severe since the stockmarket crash of 1929. Economic historians believe it was the outbreak of "tit for tat" protectionism later which turned that crash into a global depression by stifling trade.

Earlier yesterday, Mr Rudd and Indonesia's President, Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, announced their governments would set up a disaster reduction facility in Jakarta to help the region's poorest countries prepare for natural catastrophes.

Research commissioned by the two leaders found the Asia-Pacific faced an era of big disasters as urbanisation, climate change and food shortages magnified the effect of events such as earthquakes, volcanic eruptions and storms.

An assessment by Geoscience Australia said there were likely to be several disasters each year killing more than 10,000 people and there was great potential for huge catastrophes affecting more than one million people.

Mr Rudd said the Government would spend $67 million over the next five years on the disaster reduction facility.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27858912/

APEC leaders: No new trade barriers



President Bush: ‘Global protectionism is a path to global economic ruin’



The Associated Press


updated 10:32 p.m. ET, Sat., Nov. 22, 2008

LIMA, Peru - Leaders who oversee half the world’s economy pledged Saturday to avoid protectionism but shied away from any new proposals on the financial crisis because of somebody who wasn’t there: U.S. President-elect Barack Obama.

The 21 leaders endorsed last weekend’s agreement by major world economies to resist domestic pressures to protect industries, while ensuring that small and medium-sized companies have enough credit to stay afloat.

“We strongly support the Washington Declaration and will refrain within the next 12 months from raising new barriers to investment or to trade in goods and services (and from) imposing new export restrictions,” leaders of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation forum said in a joint declaration.

They also pledged to reach agreement next month on the outlines of a World Trade Organization pact that collapsed in July after seven years of negotiations. Concern over the global financial crisis injected new urgency into the so-called Doha round of trade talks.

The leaders called for greater APEC participation in the International Monetary Fund and other multilateral lenders. Japan said last week it was ready to lend up to $100 billion to the IMF, but

China has so far resisted entreaties to dig into its $1.9 trillion in reserves.

Leaders speak out against protectionismDelegates said, however, that there was little incentive to propose more concrete action without the support of Obama, who takes office in January and did not send representatives to Lima.

“The next U.S. administration must assume leadership in a very firm manner — not just for Americans but for the whole world,” Mexican President Felipe Calderon said in a speech before heading into closed-door meetings that produced the resolution.

Even people who work for the White House’s outgoing occupant, George W. Bush, acknowledged that tough issues such as a stalled U.S.-South Korea free-trade agreement would likely have to wait.

However, Bush did attempt to persuade allies to secure a North Korea disarmament deal before he leaves office, pushing hard for a late, legacy-shaping win. The White House announced that all nations engaged in the showdown with North Korea would meet in China in early December.

That nudge in the process alone was a boost to Bush, whose government is eager to lock in an international agreement on how to accurately verify North Korea’s nuclear capabilities.

Leader after leader at Saturday's forum spoke out against protectionism, saying it would bring devastating consequences.

“Companies will go bankrupt and countless jobs will be lost, and poor nations and poor people will suffer the most damage,” South Korean President Lee Myung-bak told business executives.

Bush said nations must not respond to the crisis by “imposing regulations that would stifle innovation and choke off growth.”

“One of the enduring lessons of the Great Depression is that global protectionism is a path to global economic ruin,” he said.

Free-trade success stories

The leaders argued their case with free-trade success stories. Lee, former head of the Hyundai group, said open markets were central to boosting his nation’s per-capita annual income from $100 in the 1960s to $20,000 today. Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper said the North American Free Trade Agreement has tripled trade and created 40 million jobs.

But Nick Reilly, president of General Motors Corp. Asia-Pacific, said the leaders all will face intense pressure at home to protect their most vulnerable markets.

[U.S. GOVERNMENT PROTECTION OF THE U.S. AUTO INDUSTRY WOULD BE UNNECESSARY IF GENERAL MOTORS MANAGEMENT HAD DONE ITS JOB CORRECTLY WHICH IT HAS LONG FAILED TO DO. IF GENERAL MOTORS MANAGEMENT HAS ANY KNOWLEDGE OF THE U.S. & GLOBAL AUTO MARKETS, IT CERTAINLY HAS NOT BEEN REFLECTED IN MOST OF THE PRODUCTS IT HAS MANUFACTURED DURING THE PAST 40 YEARS!! ITS MANAGEMENT HAS REPEATEDLY TAKEN THE U.S. CONSUMER FOR GRANTED AND ASSUMED THE AMERICAN MARKETPLACE WOULD CONTINUE TO ACCEPT LESS THAN MARKET-STANDARD QUALITY PRODUCTS. SUCH MISCALCULATION HAS BEEN VERY COSTLY, AS MANIFESTED MOST RECENTLY WITH THE SUV CRAZE OF THE PAST DECADE. THE ONLY WAY GENERAL MOTORS CAN IMPROVE IS TO OUST ITS CURRENT CROP OF MANAGEMENT EXECUTIVES AND REPLACE THEM WITH NEW OPEN-MINDED ENTREPREURIAL BLOOD. WHILE NOT THE FOCUS OF THIS BLOG ENTRY, THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION AND 110TH CONGRESS ARE 100% CORRECT IN INSISTING THAT GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION PROVIDE A VIABLE RESTRUCTURING PLAN SUBJECT TO SUBSEQUENT PERIODIC FINANCIAL REVIEWS, THAT WOULD RESULT IN COMPETENT, CAPABLE DECISIONMAKING AND PROFITS IN THE SHORT & LONG TERMS, BEFORE IT COULD BE ELIGIBILE TO RECEIVE U.S. TAXPAYER MONIES. SHOULD THE U.S. GOVERNMENT DECIDE TO ASSIST GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, IT WOULD EFFECTIVELY SERVE AS THE FINANCIAL LENDER 'OF LAST RESORT', AND THUS, BE ENTITLED TO BASE ITS LOANS ON STRICT CONDITIONALITIES. 'HE WHO HOLDS THE PURSE, DETERMINES THE RULES'. IF STRUCTURED PROPERLY, THIS SHOULD NOT CONSTITUTE AN ILLEGAL GOVERNMENT SUBSIDIES UNDER WTO RULES. SO, EUROPEAN AUTOMAKERS SHOULD CALM DOWN & TAKE A DEEP BREATH.]

“The economies haven’t yet seen the full impact of unemployment hit. So domestically, the leaders are going to be facing that,” Reilly told The Associated Press.

Indonesia’s trade minister, Mari Pangestu, told the AP that some protectionist measures are inevitable in the coming year or two. The secret, she said, is to not make them open-ended.

“You will have to end up protecting particular groups,” Pangestu said in an interview, giving the example of the agriculture sector in Indonesia, which accounts for 60 percent of its 237 million people.

Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper alluded to the tough decisions ahead when he described his recent re-election in terms that could just as easily apply to Obama.

Getting elected these days, he said, “is like winning a vacation to the Caribbean during hurricane season.”

© 2008 The Associated Press

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.apec.org/apec/enewsletter/nov_vol18/onlinenewsa.html

Perspectives on 2008: A Dialogue With Peru's Ministers

APEC - E Newsletter

Leaders' Week Edition - Vol18, November 2008

In an interview with the APEC Secretariat, Peru's Ministers for Foreign Affairs and Trade shared their priorities for APEC Economic Leaders' Week which will occur in Lima between November 16-23, 2008. As co-chairs of the meeting, they previewed what will be on the agenda and expressed their hope that Ministers would be able to come to agreement on a wide range of issues.

Identifying regional solutions to the financial crisis which continues to unfold, bringing together diverse interests to achieve a conclusion for the Doha Development Agenda, and supporting structural reform and capacity building as well as new issues like corporate social responsibility all remain on the agenda.

Peru's Minister for Trade, Mercedes Araoz and Minister for Foreign Relations, José Antonio García Belaunde, discuss below their perspectives on the issues.

APEC E-Newsletter (APEC E): What are the most important issues Leaders and Ministers will focus on this November?

José Antonio García Belaunde (JAGB): We are facing the most challenging economic circumstances that we have seen in decades. Leaders will focus on shaping a regional response to the crisis. A strong economy is fundamental to achieving results in many other areas of the APEC agenda. That will also be discussed by Leaders and Ministers in November.

Mercedes Araoz (MA): The high level of the Leaders' Meeting creates a great scenario for the discussion of priority issues in the region. On November 22-23, Leaders will discuss the progress towards greater economic integration in the Asia-Pacific region, the current economic situation in the Asia-Pacific as a result of the global financial turmoil; and the important issue of climate change.

At the APEC Ministerial Meeting, to be held on 19-20 November, Ministers, will cover the main issues of this year's APEC agenda. Progress on economic integration in the Asia-Pacific region is the most important issue, as we have received from the APEC Economic Leaders in 2007, very specific instructions on how to advance this work in the current year.

Another important issue is the progress on APEC's Second Trade Facilitation Action Plan (TFAP II), which by 2010, aims to reduce transaction costs by a further 5%. It is worth noting that APEC is a world leader in trade facilitation.

Besides these two issues, it is important to mention the importance of APEC adopting the Investment Facilitation Action Plan during the Ministers Responsible for Trade Meeting held on 31 May - 1 June in Arequipa, Peru; and on progress on behind-the-border reforms, or as it is also known, the Leaders' Agenda on Structural Reform (LAISR).

APEC E: What impact will the current financial turmoil have on the Asia-Pacific region and what, if there are any plans, does APEC have to address this issue?

MA: I am afraid that there are going to be very significant impacts in the region and in the world. A generalized reduction in the rate of growth, that I hope will be short lived, could be the most important one for all of us. Trade flows will decrease and credit will tighten.

In these dire circumstances, APEC members should reiterate their commitment to open markets and free trade as the best tools to quickly overcome this financial turmoil. A positive message that APEC could send to the rest of the world could be, for example, a declaration stating that we will not increase our barriers to trade until the financial problem is solved.

Another message could be the reiteration of APEC´s strong support for the prompt finalization of the Doha Development Round.

JAGB: The Asia-Pacific has played a pivotal role in sustaining world economic growth rates over many years and many APEC economies have experienced solid economic growth for over a decade. The problems in the financial markets may soon reach the real economy, consequently impacting on future economic growth. APEC Finance Ministers met in Peru on November 5-6. They analyzed the financial crisis and how to coordinate a response. APEC economies can support the excellent work undertaken by the Financial Stability Forum which is examining how to enhance market and institutional resilience.

APEC E: Leaders have consistently supported a successful conclusion to the Doha Round. What actions do you expect APEC Ministers and Leaders to take this year to create urgency for concluding these negotiations?

JAGB: We are very disappointed that it has not been possible to reach an agreement until now. The Round is likely to be complicated by the ongoing political and financial uncertainty. Nevertheless, the WTO has made very good progress so far on many aspects of Doha and we should keep working to achieve a result.

MA: I think that all APEC economies are disappointed by the impasse that the Doha Round had reached in July, but we believe in the early revival of negotiations. I am sure that, as APEC, we can work together to achieve an ambitious and balanced outcome of the Round.

Since its inception, support for the multilateral trading system has been a key priority in APEC´s work agenda. At this year's APEC Ministers Responsible for Trade Meeting in Arequipa, Peru, we decided to adopt a stand-alone statement to demonstrate our commitment to progress towards an early and successful conclusion of the Doha Round.

APEC E: Can you discuss the progress made on the priorities that Peru set earlier in the year?

JAGB: At the beginning of the year, Peru took responsibility for leading the implementation of the APEC agenda set out in the Sydney Declaration of 2007. These priorities included regional economic integration (REI), trade and investment liberalization and structural reform.

We are especially pleased that we have been able to raise the level of awareness of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) within APEC this year. Leaders will be discussing this issue in November. This year's theme for APEC is "A New Commitment to Asia-Pacific Development" and improving levels of CSR in the region promote that goal.

MA: I really believe that this year has been a very successful one because APEC has made great progress on the main 2008 priorities.

We have advanced the regional economic integration agenda, including the prospects for a Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific (FTAAP).

We have continued with the implementation of actions to advance trade and investment liberalization and facilitation: for example, the completion of model measures for RTAs/FTAs, the endorsement of the Investment Facilitation Action Plan, the development of Key Performance Indicators for the Second Trade Facilitation Action Plan and the discussion on the rationalization of rules of origin.

We've also been working on strengthening the policy agenda on ECOTECH; especially in the areas of education, small and medium enterprises, tourism, information and communication technologies, anti-corruption and transparency.

APEC E: For the first time ever, APEC Ministers met to discuss structural reform issues this year. What approaches do you expect APEC to take in order to advance this agenda item?

JAGB: We all know that implementing structural reforms can be very difficult, but the benefits speak for themselves. APEC can support individual member economies in several ways.

The Structural Reform Ministerial Meeting held this year in Melbourne approved a Good Practice Guide on Regulatory Reform. This will help economies to voluntarily review existing regulation and assess the impact of new regulation. Most importantly, ministers agreed to voluntary reviews or self-reviews of member economies' institutional frameworks that support structural reform. I think this process will help economies focus on priority areas for reform and is a good way to exchange information on how to best tackle this challenging area.

MA: Structural reform must remain at the top of the APEC agenda. We have advanced on the implementation of the Leader's Agenda but further work is necessary.

We need to work on strengthening cooperation and coordination between the Economic Committee (those who are in charge of the structural reform issues), the Committee on Trade and Investment and the Finance Ministers' Process, as well as with the private sector.

A good step has been the establishment of the APEC Policy Support Unit which will strengthen the capacity of the APEC Secretariat to assist member economies in policy dialogue on structural reform and in strengthening domestic institutions and policies that support the reform process.

APEC E: What do you think will be Peru's main contributions to the APEC agenda this year?

JAGB: We have been committed to implementing the decisions made by Leaders last year, but additionally this year, Peru wanted to emphasize the social dimension of the APEC agenda with the inclusion of Corporate Social Responsibility, besides other issues such as education, reducing the digital gap, support for small and medium enterprise and joint efforts in anti-corruption matters. Two successful Ministerial meetings in education and in small and medium enterprises have contributed to this cause.

Regarding corporate social responsibility, Peru is keen to ensure strong compliance with labor and environmental standards but also to involve the private sector in a partnership to ensure sustainable development where they have operations.

MA: We have chaired many meetings, including Sectoral Meetings of Ministers responsible for Trade, Tourism, Small and Medium Enterprises, Education and Finance.

In the area of trade and investment, we have assumed a leading role on the discussion of a Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific. Peru has conducted a study of existing bilateral and plurilateral free-trade agreements in the region with the aim of increasing knowledge of their similarities and differences, thereby enabling economies to identify possible ways in which the FTAAP concept could be furthered. New Zealand, the United States, Japan and Chile, as well as the IADB, have also contributed to this important activity. Moreover, we are collaborating with Korea and Indonesia on a review of existing analysis relevant to a possible FTAAP and are assessing the need for future work.

APEC E: In your view, how has APEC made progress on its issues under the theme, "A New Commitment to Asia-Pacific Development?"

MA: Peru proposed the theme "A New Commitment to Asia-Pacific Development" in order to give APEC the opportunity to work on the social dimension of its agenda. The objective is to encourage initiatives on the social issues that have a substantial influence on the advance towards the goals of trade and investment facilitation. To this end, we have highlighted the role of education in the social and economic development of member economies and have supported the development and modernization of small and medium enterprises.

JAGB: This theme reflects our approach to bridging the development gap in the region. I consider it essential to show how an open trade and investment policy can make a positive impact on economic development. But at the same time, we have to take account of the social dimension of trade, and that is why we have been promoting a greater uptake of corporate social responsibility in the region.

APEC E: How has APEC's capacity building program prepared member economies to better participate in the global economy?

MA: Capacity building programs are a vital part of the APEC process because they allow capacity to be developed in key priorities areas regarding trade and investment liberalization and economic and technical cooperation. These programs cover a wide range of activities, such as seminars, publications and research.

They allow developing economies such as Peru to learn from developed economies' experiences, in order to reduce the technological gap and enhance the economic growth and prosperity of the region.

This year, APEC has financed 21 Peruvian projects, which have been implemented successfully. They have allowed us to strengthen our knowledge of key areas of common interest in the region, such as the single window initiative and the data privacy pathfinder. For 2009, 16 projects were approved by the Budget and Management Committee meeting last October.

JAGB: Economic and technical cooperation is critical to APEC's work. This is especially true in areas such as the competitiveness of small and medium enterprises, and human resources development. APEC's commitment to capacity building demonstrates how the region as a whole works together to address the gap in the various levels of development.

APEC E: Corporate social responsibility has made it to the APEC agenda. How does this issue contribute to the economic growth of the region?

JAGB: I think CSR plays a key role at the local level to promote sustainable development. We have seen this in some projects undertaken by mining companies in remote communities of Peru, where the firm has invested in local infrastructure and development. I think it is clear that this has a positive reward for the individual company - it can improve the local workforce and promote better relations with local communities. [SORRY. CSR DOES NOT, BY ITSELF, CONTRIBUTE TO COMPANY PROFITS, REVENUE GROWTH OR EVEN MACROECONOMIC GROWTH.]

MA: We have introduced the issue of Corporate Social Responsibility on a voluntary basis to encourage the incorporation of social and environmental concerns into business operations, as a complement to existing public policies and programs.

As an example of our efforts in advancing this issue, we held the 5th Tourism Ministerial Meeting under the theme "Towards Responsible Tourism in the Asia-Pacific Region" to promote continuous sustainable growth in the tourism industry. We hope that the meetings' outcomes will help to generate income and employment in local communities and to promote the conservation and preservation of our environment, including the social and cultural aspects.

I am sure that a strong discussion on this issue could address challenges of great significance in the achievement of socio-economic development and equitable and sustainable growth.

[WE BEG TO DIFFER. THIS SOUNDS A LOT LIKE THE EUROPEAN UNION SPEAKING. THE EUROPEAN UNION HAS PERFECTED THE USE OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY STANDARDS SCHEMES, WHICH THE SOCIALIST PARTY WITHIN THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT SEEKS TO CONVERT INTO REGULATORY MANDATES, AS ANOTHER NEW FORM OF DISGUISED TRADE PROTECTIONISM THAT ENABLES GOVERNMENTS TO DISTINGUISH THEIR CHAMPIONED COMPANIES BASED ON NON-TECHNICAL, NON-PERFORMANCE-BASED PROCESS GROUNDS. CSR SCHEMES HAVE ALREADY RESULTED IN THE 'SOCIAL BLACKLISTING' OF COMPANIES, LET ALONE, IN LEGAL LIABILITY FOR COMPANIES, BOARD MEMBERS AND MANAGEMENT WITHIN THE U.S. THIS IS LIKELY TO OCCUR WHERE NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS DECIDE FOR THEMSELVES THAT COMPANIES HAVE FAILED TO TRUTHFULLY REPORT THEIR ACTIVITIES AS SET FORTH IN NONFINANCIAL ANNUAL REPORTS PREPARED AND SUBMITTED TO NONFINANCIAL REPORTING MECHANISMS SUCH AS THE GLOBAL REPORTING INITIATIVE AND THE UNITED NATIONS GLOBAL COMPACT OFFICE. See, e.g.: ITSSD JOURNAL ON CSR (CORPORATE SOCIAL RESTRICTION) at: http://itssdjournalcsr.blogspot.com ; ITSSD JOURNAL ON INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS, at: http://itssdinternationalstandards.blogspot.com/2008/07/absurdity-multitude-of-european-fruit.html].

What Type of 'SEAT at the Table' Will Be Reserved for an EURObama Administration??

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122591746511102337.html


And the Winner Is . . . Europe?

Firms on the Continent may gain the most under Obama.



By KYLE WINGFIELD

Wall Street Journal Europe

November 6, 2008

Amid all the celebrations in Europe of Barack Obama's election as the American president, one wonders how many glasses were clinking in boardrooms across the Continent. The early guess: a lot.

[THE LONG HIDDEN COMMON AGENDA OF THE ELITIST LIBERAL PROGRESSIVE WING OF THE U.S. DEMOCRATIC PARTY AND THEIR EUROPEAN WELFARE STATE-MINDED COUSINS IN THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION & THE SOCIAL DEMOCRACIES OF FRANCE, GERMANY AND GREAT BRITAIN IS NOW PALPABLE & VISIBLE, AS THEY EACH SIP THEIR FRENCH & CALIFORNIA WINES AND CHAMPAGNES AND 'PURE' GERMAN BEERS IN CELEBRATION OF THE OSTENSIBLE COLLECTIVE VICTORY OF 'SOFT' SOCIALISM OVER 'COWBOY' CAPITALISM.]

Many U.S. companies will be apprehensive about what an Obama administration coupled with a strongly Democratic Congress will mean for them: higher tax rates, or certainly not lower ones; greater power for trade unions after a decades-long pendulum swing toward management; stricter environmental regulations and possibly a cap-and-trade system; less inclination to negotiate meaningful free-trade agreements; a spate of new federal judges who are hostile to business interests. European firms can view these developments as a leveling of the playing field -- or even a tilting of the field in their favor.

[See ITSSD Press Release: Putting Country First Means Defending America's Sovereignty, Constitution and Free Enterprise System Against Foreign Incursion, PR Newswire (Sept. 6, 2008) at: http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS134761+08-Sep-2008+PRN20080908 ].

[See Lawrence A. Kogan, Exporting Europe's Protectionism, The National Interest (Fall 2004), accessible on ITSSD Main Website at: http://www.itssd.org/Publications/Kogan%20TNI%2077FINAL.pdf ].

[IT IS NO LONGER A SECRET THAT THE LIBERAL WING OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY HAS ACHIEVED ITS LONG-TERM GOAL - OF RETURNING THE U.S. TO THE TRANSATLANTIC NEGOTIATING TABLE TO HARMONIZE AMERICA'S ENLIGHTENMENT ERA-INSPIRED FREE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM & COMMON LAW-BASED LEGAL SYSTEM WITH CONTINENTAL EUROPE'S SOCIAL WELFARE STATE ECONOMIC & CIVIL LAW-BASED LEGAL SYSTEMS. HOWEVER, THE TABLE AT WHICH THEY NOW CELEBRATE AND THE SEAT EACH NOW OCCUPIES WILL CERTAINLY BE DIFFERENT FROM THAT AT WHICH THEY ALL ROLL UP THEIR SLEEVES TO DO THEIR 'DIRTY' WORK.]

New regulations will play a large role in this leveling exercise. For instance, trade unions are licking their chops at the prospect of Democrats running both the executive and legislative branches. One of the items on their wish list is "card check," which would eliminate secret ballots among employees deciding whether to join a union.

Should card check help unions to boost their membership substantially from its current trough, American companies will be forced to make some of the same concessions that European firms have been making all along. Part of the trans-Atlantic competitiveness gap would be erased.

Environmental laws are another area where American competitiveness could fall toward European levels. Businesses in the EU already have to deal with a cap-and-trade system to curb carbon emissions. It's a good bet that the same will be true in America within the next four years, and the U.S. will probably work closely with Europe to create a successor to the Kyoto Protocol.

While the faulty construction of the first phase of the European Union's Emissions Trading Scheme limited the impact on businesses, the screws are being tightened in the second phase and more industries (e.g., airlines) are being sucked in. Any hit to European industry's global competitiveness, though, will be greatly softened if the U.S. introduces its own cap-and-trade system.

And as we've already seen in the automotive industry, a Washington that's determined to subsidize companies' transition to the low-carbon economy will only encourage European capitals to do the same.

Thus the $25 billion in public loans that have already been granted to Detroit, with another $25 billion possibly on the way once Mr. Obama takes office, have spurred Europe to consider a €40 billion loan program for its own car makers. The manufacturers will gladly take this taxpayer money.

[YES. THIS IS THE ULTIMATE GOVERNMENT APPROVED AND INDUSTRY LOBBIED 'SUBSIDY'!]

Both environmental laws and labor regulations are ways in which European firms wouldn't necessarily improve themselves, only see their American rivals become less competitive. A more positive benefit for Europe could come in the trade arena.

Those who hope Mr. Obama will breathe new life into a multilateral trade deal like the Doha Round are likely to be disappointed. There are trade experts who believe the president-elect and his advisers have more free-trade instincts than they've let on -- witness the brouhaha earlier this year over whether talk about a President Obama unilaterally rewriting the North American Free Trade Agreement was just a way of winning over protectionist-minded Democrats during the primary campaign.

The problem with that optimistic view is that Mr. Obama will face a Congress that views trade liberalization as anathema. Democrats on Capitol Hill haven't blocked bilateral trade deals with the like of Colombia and South Korea because George W. Bush wanted them, but because their trade-union supporters did not want them.

Democrats' refusal to approve those deals, alongside America's inability to push through a Doha deal, has opened the door for the EU to take the lead in bilateral free-trade agreements. Since lifting its self-imposed moratorium on bilaterals once it became clear that Doha was going nowhere, Brussels has been aggressive on this front. It has courted Canada, India, South Korea, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations and others.

Bilateral trade deals can mean administrative headaches for companies that do business in a number of countries. But however imperfectly, they do open markets. In just about anywhere outside U.S. borders, European industry could gain from American protectionism.

None of these gains will materialize, though, if European governments take the Obama era of "change" as an excuse to halt their slow crawl toward economic reform. Other countries or regions outside Europe could also choose to take advantage of a fall in U.S. competitiveness.

It would make no sense to react to an upswing in American trade-union power, for instance, by freezing the liberalization of Europe's still-rigid labor markets. This is one time it might not pay to follow America's lead.

Mr. Wingfield edits the Business Europe column.